Web Analytics

Restaurants

Burgers
Chicken
Mexican
Sandwiches & subs
Coffee & breakfast
Bowls & more
All 31 restaurants →

Diets

High ProteinLow SodiumDiabeticKetoLow CalorieLow SugarWeight LossGLP-1VegetarianVegan All diet hubs →

Calculators

StarbucksBuild your order — sizes, milk, syrupsDunkin’Build your order — sizes, swirls, shots All calculators →
GuidesAllergensBest Of Compare restaurants
Head to head · Updated June 2026

Whataburger vs McDonald’s: Which Is Healthier?

Whataburger
61 items scored
Avg C 63/100
McDonald’s
155 items scored
Avg C 60/100

By average Nom Score across its full published menu, Whataburger has the healthier menu of the two — 63/100 (a C) versus McDonald’s’s 60 (a C). It is close, though: McDonald’s averages fewer calories (372 vs 474 per item) and less sodium (550 vs 985 mg), while Whataburger averages more protein per 100 calories (4.7g vs 3.4g).

The numbers

Whataburger vs McDonald’s, side by side

Menu-wide averages, computed across every published item we track for each chain. A green check marks the better figure in each row.

Per item Whataburger McDonald’s
Avg Nom Score 63C 60C
Avg calories / item 474 372
Avg sodium (mg) 985 550
Avg sugar (g) 10.6 20.7
Protein / 100 cal 4.7g 3.4g
Items on menu 61 155
Category by category

Who wins each category

Where both chains compete, here is the average Nom Score of every item in that category. A chain can win one category and lose another — the higher score is greener.

Burgers
61Whataburger
vs
McDonald’s59
Chicken
68Whataburger
vs
McDonald’s61
Breakfast
58Whataburger
vs
McDonald’s59
Sides
86Whataburger
vs
McDonald’s90
Shakes & desserts
52Whataburger
vs
McDonald’s58
Coffee & drinks
63Whataburger
vs
McDonald’s59
Order this

The healthiest picks at each

The three highest-scoring menu items (50+ calories) at each chain — a smarter order beats the menu average at either one.

Methodology. Every figure is computed from published nutrition data for 61 Whataburger items and 155 McDonald’s items, current as of June 27, 2026. Each item is graded A–F by the Nom Score, which weighs sodium, saturated fat, sugar, portion size, fiber, and protein per calorie against FDA Daily Values (sodium 2,300 mg).

Per-chain averages span each chain’s entire published menu — entrees, sides, drinks, and desserts — the same full-menu basis as our State of Fast Food Nutrition report, so the numbers reconcile across the site. Because menu mix differs between chains, an average describes a whole menu, not any single order.

We compare published nutrition data only; verdicts are by average Nom Score, not taste. Values may vary by location and over time. Restaurant names and trademarks belong to their owners; Nom is an independent guide.

Cite or embed this page
Cite this page
Nom. (2026). Whataburger vs McDonald's: Which Is Healthier? (2026). Retrieved from https://nom.now/vs/whataburger-vs-mcdonalds
Common questions

Frequently asked

Is Whataburger or McDonald’s healthier?
By average Nom Score across its full published menu, Whataburger is the healthier of the two, averaging 63 out of 100 (a C) versus McDonald’s’s 60 (a C).
Does Whataburger or McDonald’s have fewer calories?
McDonald’s averages fewer calories per item — 372 versus 474 across the full menu.
Which has less sodium, Whataburger or McDonald’s?
McDonald’s averages less sodium — 550 mg per item versus 985 mg.
Which chain wins in more categories?
Comparing the categories where both chains compete, Whataburger has the higher average Nom Score in 3 of 6 and McDonald’s in 3. Category winners can differ from the overall menu average, so the best pick depends on what you order.

Find the healthiest option, anywhere

Nom grades every fast food menu item A–F by the Nom Score, so you can order the best option at any restaurant.

Free to use 1,600+ items graded No signup needed