Web Analytics

Restaurants

Burgers
Chicken
Mexican
Sandwiches & subs
Coffee & breakfast
Bowls & more
All 31 restaurants →

Diets

High ProteinLow SodiumDiabeticKetoLow CalorieLow SugarWeight LossGLP-1VegetarianVegan All diet hubs →

Calculators

StarbucksBuild your order — sizes, milk, syrupsDunkin’Build your order — sizes, swirls, shots All calculators →
GuidesAllergensBest Of Compare restaurants
Head to head · Updated June 2026

Shake Shack vs Culver’s: Which Is Healthier?

Shake Shack
40 items scored
Avg C 54/100
Culver’s
53 items scored
Avg C 63/100

By average Nom Score across its full published menu, Culver’s has the healthier menu of the two — 63/100 (a C) versus Shake Shack’s 54 (a C). It is close, though: Culver’s averages fewer calories (441 vs 594 per item), less sodium (871 vs 1,090 mg), and more protein per 100 calories (4.9g vs 4.3g).

The numbers

Shake Shack vs Culver’s, side by side

Menu-wide averages, computed across every published item we track for each chain. A green check marks the better figure in each row.

Per item Shake Shack Culver’s
Avg Nom Score 54C 63C
Avg calories / item 594 441
Avg sodium (mg) 1,090 871
Avg sugar (g) 22.1 9
Protein / 100 cal 4.3g 4.9g
Items on menu 40 53
Category by category

Who wins each category

Where both chains compete, here is the average Nom Score of every item in that category. A chain can win one category and lose another — the higher score is greener.

Burgers
54Shake Shack
vs
Culver’s64
Chicken
65Shake Shack
vs
Culver’s63
Sides
66Shake Shack
vs
Culver’s65
Shakes & desserts
47Shake Shack
vs
Culver’s51
Order this

The healthiest picks at each

The three highest-scoring menu items (50+ calories) at each chain — a smarter order beats the menu average at either one.

Methodology. Every figure is computed from published nutrition data for 40 Shake Shack items and 53 Culver’s items, current as of June 27, 2026. Each item is graded A–F by the Nom Score, which weighs sodium, saturated fat, sugar, portion size, fiber, and protein per calorie against FDA Daily Values (sodium 2,300 mg).

Per-chain averages span each chain’s entire published menu — entrees, sides, drinks, and desserts — the same full-menu basis as our State of Fast Food Nutrition report, so the numbers reconcile across the site. Because menu mix differs between chains, an average describes a whole menu, not any single order.

We compare published nutrition data only; verdicts are by average Nom Score, not taste. Values may vary by location and over time. Restaurant names and trademarks belong to their owners; Nom is an independent guide.

Cite or embed this page
Cite this page
Nom. (2026). Shake Shack vs Culver's: Which Is Healthier? (2026). Retrieved from https://nom.now/vs/shake-shack-vs-culvers
Common questions

Frequently asked

Is Shake Shack or Culver’s healthier?
By average Nom Score across its full published menu, Culver’s is the healthier of the two, averaging 63 out of 100 (a C) versus Shake Shack’s 54 (a C).
Does Shake Shack or Culver’s have fewer calories?
Culver’s averages fewer calories per item — 441 versus 594 across the full menu.
Which has less sodium, Shake Shack or Culver’s?
Culver’s averages less sodium — 871 mg per item versus 1,090 mg.
Which chain wins in more categories?
Comparing the categories where both chains compete, Shake Shack has the higher average Nom Score in 2 of 4 and Culver’s in 2. Category winners can differ from the overall menu average, so the best pick depends on what you order.

Find the healthiest option, anywhere

Nom grades every fast food menu item A–F by the Nom Score, so you can order the best option at any restaurant.

Free to use 1,600+ items graded No signup needed